Many countries have moved from overnight or batch-based clearing to real-time systems that process payments within seconds and operate on a near-continuous basis. This shift has reduced settlement risk and improved liquidity management, making it easier for institutions to support use cases that rely on instant confirmation, such as just-in-time payroll and instant merchant settlement. As these capabilities expand, banks and processors are replacing siloed, institution-specific platforms with architectures that rely on shared standards and greater interoperability across participants.
These infrastructure changes are unfolding alongside broader technological shifts among financial institutions. Core processing is gradually moving to cloud environments, interfaces are opening through APIs, and fraud management is becoming more centralized and data driven. Richer messaging formats such as ISO 20022 give institutions more structured data for compliance and risk control, while API frameworks allow authorized third parties to initiate payments securely on behalf of customers. Together, these developments have made the backend more adaptable and better matched to the demands of digital commerce, so that account-based systems can handle higher volumes, lower latency and a wider range of integrated services than in the past.
On the front end, the most visible change has been the proliferation of ways in which users can access their accounts. Cards introduced the idea that account-based payments could be initiated with a plastic credential rather than a visit to a branch or the use of paper instruments. Mobile banking, wallets and QR-based payments extended this idea into mobile applications, making it possible to embed payment initiation directly into commerce, mobility and lifestyle services. As these channels mature, payments are becoming less of a separate step and more of an integrated feature within broader digital services used on a daily basis.
Transit and mobility services illustrate this shift clearly. For example, in Michinori Holdings, a wholly owned subsidiary of IGPI and the holding company for a portfolio of transport operators across Japan, our bus networks historically relied on onboard cash payments and simple ticketing, requiring drivers and back-office staff to handle cash, reconcile fares and manage payment records separately from other operational systems.
As cashless options have been introduced, passengers can now use a mix of instruments, including reloadable contactless smart cards used for transport and small purchases, credit cards and QR code payments, with these digital methods often integrated with journey information and digital ticketing. For passengers, boarding has now become a matter of tapping a card or presenting a device, with the payment interaction embedded in the journey rather than treated as a separate task. Behind the scenes, fares are still settled through accounts held with banks or payment providers, but operators gain a more integrated view of usage and revenue and can align payment data more closely with scheduling, routing and service design.
Account-based systems have also seen meaningful shifts in how value is captured around them. Traditional revenue streams such as interchange, scheme fees, account maintenance charges and FX margins are under pressure from regulation and low-cost account-to-account payment schemes. At the same time, the movement of funds itself is becoming more commoditized as real-time payment rails expand and more providers can offer similar speed and reliability. In response, banks and payment providers are placing more emphasis on services that sit around the transaction rather than on the transaction fee alone, including risk and fraud management, data-driven reporting, integration with enterprise systems and tailored solutions for specific sectors such as mobility, e-commerce or tourism.
For operators that build on account-based payments, including transport and regional service providers, this has encouraged a move toward bundled and partnership driven models. Instead of treating payments purely as a back-office utility, they are increasingly embedded in broader offerings that might combine ticketing, loyalty, identity management and operational analytics. Revenue can then come from a mix of fees, cost savings and new services enabled by better payment data, such as optimized routing or dynamic pricing, while financial institutions benefit from deeper integration with client workflows rather than from stand-alone payment charges. In effect, the business model is gradually shifting from selling individual payment transactions to building and monetizing ecosystems of services that are organized around accounts.
Japan’s transport smart card schemes, such as Suica and PASMO, show what this evolution can look like in practice. Originally designed as tools for rail and bus ticketing, these cards have expanded into multi-purpose digital payment accounts that can be used for transport, retail purchases, vending machines, station lockers and other small value payments. This extension of usage has allowed operators and partners to generate additional revenue from retail acceptance, to form partnerships with convenience stores, rail operators and tourism providers, and to use the data for services such as passenger flow optimization and capacity planning. The business model has effectively moved from selling individual tickets to operating a payment enabled mobility platform, with the account at its center.
Looking ahead, the future of account-based payments is likely to be shaped less by changes to the underlying model and more by how users access it. As payment initiation becomes embedded in devices, vehicles, buildings and digital services, the account remains the anchor while the interactions with it becomes increasingly indirect. The spread of instant account-to-account payment rails, broader API connectivity and richer data standards will support this shift by making the act of moving funds even more commoditized. The competitive frontier is therefore moving to the layer above the payment itself, where firms differentiate themselves through context and service design rather than through the mechanics of settlement.
Biometric and device-based credentials point toward what this next stage could look like. NEC’s face recognition service at Nanki Shirahama Airport, for example, allows travelers who have pre-registered their facial information and payment credentials to access shops, restaurants and other services simply by presenting their face. The payment interaction itself becomes almost frictionless while the transaction still settles through the customer’s underlying account. Projects like this suggest a future in which account-based payments are triggered through physical presence or contextual cues rather than through cards or phone screens, and where transactions occur more naturally within a broader travel or retail journey. In this model, identity and authentication become the interface, and the account continues to serve as the trusted ledger beneath it.
At the backend, AI-driven cybersecurity and new cryptographic tools are reshaping how account-based systems are secured and audited. Financial institutions are already deploying models that detect anomalies in real time and adjust fraud controls automatically, and as threats grow more coordinated, these tools may run across multiple institutions to compare signals without exposing individual customer data. In parallel, elements of cryptographic infrastructure such as tokenized deposits and distributed ledgers can be introduced selectively into existing account platforms to improve data integrity, reduce reconciliation gaps and support conditional or programmable settlement while leaving the underlying customer-institution ledger relationship intact.
On the customer side, account-based payments may increasingly function as a foundation for lifestyle and public services rather than a separate financial step. A single account could support welfare disbursements, mobility spending, small household purchases and more. Although the interaction points would differ substantially, all payments can draw on the same underlying account, whether it is a vehicle verifying the driver biometrically and settling tolls in the background or a traveler using a single balance that carries identity, retail spending and insurance entitlements across borders. In each case, the account acts as the persistent anchor for value, identity rules and usage controls across settings that are becoming more automated.
Super-apps such as Grab, Gojek and Shopee point towards another pathway in which payments become a gateway to a broader lifestyle operating system. These platforms bundle transport, food delivery, commerce, insurance, credit, savings and rewards into a single environment where the user’s account is the reference point for creditworthiness and behavioral data. As these ecosystems expand, the account becomes not only a settlement instrument but also the foundation for personalization, loyalty structures and cross-service monetization. This model shows how account-based payments could evolve into multi-sector engagement platforms, particularly in regions where mobile-first consumer behavior supports deep integration across daily activities.
These developments all point to a new phase for account-based payments rather than their replacement. The ledger relationship between customers and institutions remains constant, but the infrastructure that moves funds is getting faster and more interoperable, the interfaces which trigger payments are increasingly woven into everyday activities, and the business models are shifting toward broader service ecosystems. As embedded finance, cryptographic assurances and AI-driven security mature, the act of paying may fade even further into the background while trust in the underlying account becomes even more central. The key question is not whether accounts will disappear, but how institutions and partners will design the next generation of services, controls and commercial arrangements around them.
To find out more about how IGPI Group can provide support for businesses, browse through our insight articles or get in contact with us.
Zitin Bali, Analyst of IGPI Singapore
Zitin began her career at IGPI after completing a degree in Data Science and Economics from the National University of Singapore, with a minor in Political Science. She first joined IGPI as a senior-year intern and returned a year later to begin her full-time role. Her strengths lie in economic modelling, data analysis, and data visualisation. In addition to her experience at IGPI, Zitin previously interned at Monee, where she conducted market research on the payments industry, and at SCOR Reinsurance, where she developed dashboards to visualise large datasets.
IGPI Group is a Japan rooted premium management consulting & Investment Group headquartered in Tokyo with a footprint in Osaka, Singapore, Hanoi, Shanghai & Melbourne, as well as parts of Europe and India. The organization was established in 2007 by former members of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan (IRCJ), a USD 100 billion sovereign wealth fund focusing on turn-around projects in Japan. IGPI Group has 13 institutional investors, including Nomura Holdings, SMBC, KDDI, Recruit and Sumitomo Corporation to name a few. IGPI Group has vast experience in supporting Fortune 500s, Govt. agencies, Universities, SMEs and funded startups across Asia and beyond for their strategic business needs and hands-on support across a wide variety of industries. IGPI group has approximately 8,500 employees on a consolidated basis.
* This material is intended merely for reference purposes based on our experience and is not intended to be comprehensive and does not constitute as advice. Information contained in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but IGPI does not represent or warrant the quality, completeness, and accuracy of such information. All rights reserved by IGPI.
For companies, the real power of AI rarely resides in the models themselves. It comes from how they are applied. The most successful organizations do not chase technology for its own sake. They begin with clear business pain points and ask how AI can improve decisions, efficiency, or customer experience in measurable ways.
Manufacturers use predictive algorithms to anticipate equipment failures before they happen. Banks deploy AI to detect fraud and refine risk models. These are not headline-grabbing projects, yet they deliver consistent value. The lesson is clear: AI is not a magic wand but a tool that must be embedded into workflows and evaluated by outcomes such as time saved, costs reduced, and quality improved. Firms that treat AI as a practical process enhancer, rather than a shiny experiment, will be the ones to reap lasting benefits.
The current industry obsession with infrastructure such as foundation models, GPUs, and compute power is understandable but incomplete. These investments are capital-intensive and highly visible, but the real disruption comes when AI transforms how businesses operate.
AI’s enduring value will emerge when it reshapes business models by enabling dynamic pricing, adaptive logistics, or self-optimizing decision frameworks. These are not just technological breakthroughs; they are organizational ones. They require new thinking about how companies create and capture value. Many firms are building technological muscle while neglecting the commercial reinvention required for durable innovation. Those that align AI with strategy instead of spectacle will define the next competitive landscape.
The current infrastructure race has concentrated immense power among a handful of global technology giants. A small number of firms now control the data pipelines, computing capacity, and platforms on which the entire AI ecosystem depends. This centralization has accelerated progress—but also introduced systemic fragility.
If demand slows, regulation tightens, or technical progress disappoints, these giants could all pull back at once, triggering a cascading contraction reminiscent of the dotcom bust or Japan’s bubble economy of the 1990s. Overreliance on a few providers also limits diversity and experimentation. The alternative is a more open and distributed ecosystem—one that encourages open-source models, regional data strategies, and interoperability standards. Such diversity would make AI more resilient and more inclusive.
As companies race to deploy AI, the line between ambition and recklessness grows thin. Responsible innovation requires discipline: clear metrics for success, thresholds for risk, and mechanisms for accountability. Small-scale pilots and explainable algorithms can help avoid the reputational and financial damage that often follows hype-driven projects.
AI should be treated as an instrument of transformation, not a corporate trophy. Firms that pursue it merely to appear modern will soon find themselves burdened with costly, underperforming systems. Those that build governance into their innovation processes will be far better equipped to balance enthusiasm with prudence.
Every technological revolution passes through a cycle of excess, collapse, and consolidation. The dotcom era ended with disillusionment, but from its ashes rose the infrastructure and regulatory frameworks that underpin today’s digital economy. The same evolution may await AI.
After the speculative froth recedes, costs will fall, standards will mature, and adoption will become more sustainable. Policymakers must prepare for that stage by fostering fair competition, safeguarding data, and improving energy efficiency while keeping innovation alive. For investors and executives alike, volatility is inevitable, but so is renewal.
Bubbles, in the end, are not purely destructive. They clear the field for genuine progress. When the noise subsides, the long-term winners will be those who built AI not as spectacle but as substance.
To find out more about how IGPI Group can provide support for businesses, browse through our insight articles or get in contact with us.
Kohki Sakata, Partner of IGPI Group & CEO of IGPI Singapore
After joining Cap Gemini and Coca Cola, Kohki joined Revamp Corporation where he managed projects on global expansion and turnaround in various sectors including F&B, healthcare, retail, IT, etc. After joining IGPI, he has managed projects mainly on global expansion and cross border M&A in various sectors such as logistics, IT, telecom, retail, etc. In addition to his broad experience in implementing solutions that has been developed in Western countries, he has developed multiple methods to turnaround Asian companies with focus on setting clear vision and employee empowerment. Kohki has proven the practicality of these methods by turning around Asian companies not only as an advisor but also as senior management.
He graduated from Waseda University Department of Political Science and Economics and IE Business School.
Shivaji Das, Managing Director of IGPI Singapore
Shivaji has over 20 years of strategy consulting experience, specializing in New Business Models, Innovation Roadmaps, and Sustainability Journeys. He has worked with private and public sector clients across 25 countries in sectors like Technology, Semiconductors, Chemicals, Healthcare, Renewable Energy, and Construction. Previously, Shivaji was a Partner and Managing Director-APAC at Frost & Sullivan. His paper on Artificial Intelligence was presented at CAINE-2000 in Hawaii, USA. He is the author of seven acclaimed travel, art and business books including The Visible Invisibles and Rebels, Traitors, Peacemakers (both Penguin Random House), as well as The Great Lockdown: lessons learned during the pandemic from organizations around the world (Wiley, USA).
He is an alumnus of IIT Delhi and IIM Calcutta.
IGPI Group is a Japan rooted premium management consulting & Investment Group headquartered in Tokyo with a footprint in Osaka, Singapore, Hanoi, Shanghai & Melbourne, as well as parts of Europe and India. The organization was established in 2007 by former members of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan (IRCJ), a USD 100 billion sovereign wealth fund focusing on turn-around projects in Japan. IGPI Group has 13 institutional investors, including Nomura Holdings, SMBC, KDDI, Recruit & Sumitomo Corporation to name a few. IGPI Group has vast experience in supporting Fortune 500s, Govt. agencies, Universities, SMEs and funded startups across Asia and beyond for their strategic business needs and hands-on support across a wide variety of industries. IGPI group has ~8,500 employees on a consolidated basis.
* This material is intended merely for reference purposes based on our experience and is not intended to be comprehensive and does not constitute as advice. Information contained in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but IGPI does not represent or warrant the quality, completeness, and accuracy of such information. All rights reserved by IGPI.
But despite massive expectations, measurable productivity gains from AI remain elusive. Only a fraction of projects deliver measurable results, and promised boosts to efficiency and income have yet to materialize. Optimism seems to have outpaced evidence.
The current AI-driven market mania bears an uncanny resemblance to the late-1990s dotcom bubble. Then, as now, investors poured money into firms whose valuations soared far beyond their profits. Today’s AI champions trade at price-to-earnings multiples reminiscent of that period, while smaller firms with tenuous business models, such as quantum computing startups or miniature nuclear-reactor ventures, command startling valuations. Retail investors have also joined the party, drawn by the same speculative energy that once inflated the shares of internet darlings.
There are, however, differences that make this boom more complex — and potentially more perilous. The scale of investment is staggering. Whereas the dotcom bubble saw perhaps half a trillion dollars poured into infrastructure, global data center investments are already nearing that figure, with forecasts of an additional five trillion dollars over the next five years. The AI frenzy is no longer confined to Silicon Valley; it has become a planetary phenomenon, stretching from Tokyo to Toronto.
The backbone of this rapid AI expansion — vast networks of data centers — is also its Achilles’ heel. Facilities that once consumed 100 megawatts now demand gigawatt-scale power, creating unprecedented pressure on energy infrastructure. Meeting this appetite will require expanding global electricity generation by as much as 30% within a decade. Companies are already scouting remote regions for off-grid energy sources, including solar arrays and even private nuclear reactors.
Yet this scramble raises critical questions about sustainability, cost, and technological obsolescence. Rapid advances in chip design could render today’s multibillion-dollar facilities outdated before their debts are paid — a risk that leaves power utilities hesitant to commit to long-term supply contracts. Adding to the fragility is a resurgence of risky financing practices. Some firms are extending credit to their own customers or suppliers to maintain momentum, echoing the vendor-financing excesses that deepened the dotcom collapse.
A sharp correction in AI valuations would ripple far beyond the technology sector. A year ago, the fallout might have been contained within a few cash-rich tech giants. But the ecosystem has since expanded to include smaller cloud providers, data-center real estate trusts, and heavily leveraged newcomers with weak credit profiles. Lending markets, pension funds, and government-backed agencies are now deeply entwined with AI’s capital flows.
Should confidence falter, the shock would not be limited to a few firms in California or Osaka — it could reverberate through the financial system, potentially precipitating a broader downturn and exposing vulnerabilities across global markets.
Speculation is easy to spot; transformation is harder. Valuation multiples and volatility indices can reveal bubble-like conditions, but genuine innovation becomes apparent only over time. The hallmarks of true technological revolutions — electrification, mechanized transport, modern medicine — were steady and widespread improvements in productivity, living standards, and equality. By these measures, AI’s impact remains modest, despite its extraordinary promise.
For now, the sector straddles two futures: one of enduring progress and one of exuberant excess. Whether AI becomes the next electricity, or the next dotcom era phenomenon depends not on market valuations, but on whether its promise translates into tangible productivity gains for workers, firms, and societies at large.
Artificial Intelligence has captured global attention — and capital — fuelling a surge in markets from Wall Street to the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The Nikkei 225, like many indices, has risen on a tide of optimism. While signs of a speculative AI bubble remain clear, it is uncertain when, or how sharply, such a bubble will burst. Yet just as the technologies that survived the dotcom collapse reshaped our lives, AI too holds transformative potential. Whether the eventual market correction hampers that transformation remains a key question for policymakers, investors, and businesses worldwide.
To find out more about how IGPI Group can provide support for businesses, browse through our insight articles or get in contact with us.
Kohki Sakata, Partner of IGPI Group & CEO of IGPI Singapore
After joining Cap Gemini and Coca Cola, Kohki joined Revamp Corporation where he managed projects on global expansion and turnaround in various sectors including F&B, healthcare, retail, IT, etc. After joining IGPI, he has managed projects mainly on global expansion and cross border M&A in various sectors such as logistics, IT, telecom, retail, etc. In addition to his broad experience in implementing solutions that has been developed in Western countries, he has developed multiple methods to turnaround Asian companies with focus on setting clear vision and employee empowerment. Kohki has proven the practicality of these methods by turning around Asian companies not only as an advisor but also as senior management.
He graduated from Waseda University Department of Political Science and Economics and IE Business School.
Shivaji Das, Managing Director of IGPI Singapore
Shivaji has over 20 years of strategy consulting experience, specializing in New Business Models, Innovation Roadmaps, and Sustainability Journeys. He has worked with private and public sector clients across 25 countries in sectors like Technology, Semiconductors, Chemicals, Healthcare, Renewable Energy, and Construction. Previously, Shivaji was a Partner and Managing Director-APAC at Frost & Sullivan. His paper on Artificial Intelligence was presented at CAINE-2000 in Hawaii, USA. He is the author of seven acclaimed travel, art and business books including The Visible Invisibles and Rebels, Traitors, Peacemakers (both Penguin Random House), as well as The Great Lockdown: lessons learned during the pandemic from organizations around the world (Wiley, USA).
He is an alumnus of IIT Delhi and IIM Calcutta.
IGPI Group is a Japan rooted premium management consulting & Investment Group headquartered in Tokyo with a footprint in Osaka, Singapore, Hanoi, Shanghai & Melbourne, as well as parts of Europe and India. The organization was established in 2007 by former members of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan (IRCJ), a USD 100 billion sovereign wealth fund focusing on turn-around projects in Japan. IGPI Group has 13 institutional investors, including Nomura Holdings, SMBC, KDDI, Recruit & Sumitomo Corporation to name a few. IGPI Group has vast experience in supporting Fortune 500s, Govt. agencies, Universities, SMEs and funded startups across Asia and beyond for their strategic business needs and hands-on support across a wide variety of industries. IGPI group has ~8,500 employees on a consolidated basis.
* This material is intended merely for reference purposes based on our experience and is not intended to be comprehensive and does not constitute as advice. Information contained in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but IGPI does not represent or warrant the quality, completeness, and accuracy of such information. All rights reserved by IGPI.
With Japan taking on an increasingly strategic role in ASEAN’s smart city financing, combining investment support with technical expertise, this article explores the key criteria and practical pathways cities can adopt to secure Japanese capital.
As of September 2024, the ASEAN Smart Cities Network (ASCN) has recorded 108 active smart city projects across the region. These initiatives cover six key focus areas: civic and social services, quality environment, built infrastructure, industry and innovation, safety and security, and health and well-being.
Smart city development in ASEAN is expected to continue expanding alongside the region’s rapid urbanization, with the urban population projected to rise from approximately 350 million today to nearly 405 million by 2030, representing around 56 percent of the region’s total population. This growth will place increasing pressure on infrastructure, mobility, energy systems, public services, and the environment.
Smart city initiatives are expected to play a crucial role in addressing these challenges by integrating technology-driven solutions across sectors such as healthcare, education, transport, housing, and public services. The goal is not only to enhance quality of life but also to drive sustainable economic growth and strengthen regional competitiveness.
Financing opportunities for smart city projects in ASEAN are increasing, yet investment readiness remains a significant barrier. Funding is available through public budgets, bilateral and multilateral programs, and private sector participation.
Despite this growing pool of funding, many smart city proposals fail to attract investment. Beyond regulatory and governance challenges, the main barriers include insufficient data, weak feasibility assessments, and misalignment with investor expectations. Many initiatives present compelling visions but fail to provide the economic, social, and technical justification required to demonstrate true viability.
Moreover, project developers often fail to align with investor expectations—such as return potential, risk structure, and the tangible value a project will deliver. Without alignment to these criteria, even well-intentioned projects struggle to gain investor confidence and fail to progress beyond the conceptual stage.
Japan’s commitment to smart city development in ASEAN has progressed from offering technical advice to actively sharing end-to-end project expertise. Through initiatives such as the Japan-ASEAN Smart Cities Network (JASCA) and Smart JAMP, Japan supports cities not only with best practices and knowledge exchange but also across the entire project lifecycle—from feasibility studies and planning to implementation guidance. This collaborative approach ensures that solutions are context-specific, practical, and aligned with local development needs.
Beyond knowledge support, Japan is now playing a direct investment role in smart city initiatives across the region. The Japanese government has committed ¥250 billion (approximately USD 2.4 billion) to support Japanese companies to participate in smart city projects in Southeast Asia.
This financing includes ¥50 billion (USD 483.5 million) from the Japan Overseas Infrastructure Investment Corporation for Transport and Urban Development (JOIN) and ¥200 billion (USD 1.9 billion) from the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC). By combining financial backing with technical partnership, Japan is positioning itself as both a knowledge leader and a strategic investor in ASEAN’s urban transformation.
Investors assess the broader ecosystem and economic foundations of a city before committing capital. Two recurring success factors consistently shape investor confidence: Sustainability as an Economic Engine and Digital Evolution as a Growth Catalyst.
Many emerging smart city developments have struggled over time because they focus on livability, housing, or aesthetics without establishing the economic engine needed for long-term growth. For a smart city to be viable, sustainability must operate as an integrated ecosystem—one that improves quality of life while actively supporting economic activity. This includes creating conditions where businesses can invest, operate, and expand, supported by enabling infrastructure, sound regulation, and accessible markets. In short, a city becomes attractive to investors when it combines social well-being with economic scalability.
Digital evolution plays a critical role in signaling future readiness. Cities that leverage digital transformation as a growth driver are better positioned to attract capital. This typically begins with a shift from “heavy to light,” where traditional physical infrastructure is reduced or replaced through solutions such as digital twins, smart street lighting, or IoT-based systems. As these digital layers expand, the development cycle eventually shifts “from light back to heavy,” prompting new investments in infrastructure like data centers, 5G networks, and advanced connectivity. Cities that can manage both phases show adaptability, resilience, and long-term scalability—qualities that significantly increase investor confidence.
Japanese companies follow a clear investment philosophy when making decisions about smart city development. Beyond the pursuit of attractive economic returns, IGPI, a Japan-based investment firm, anchors its approach on two core principles: citizen-centricity and value creation.
Japanese companies, including IGPI, prioritize smart city initiatives that respond to real community needs rather than being driven solely by technological trends. Technology is viewed as an enabler to create tangible value and improve citizens’ quality of life.
The focus is on solving pressing urban challenges such as congestion, housing, mobility, public health, education, and access to essential services. A project is considered “smart” only when it delivers visible and measurable improvements that citizens can experience, adopt, and benefit from in their daily lives.
In line with the broader Japanese investment philosophy in ASEAN smart cities, IGPI considers a project investable only when it offers opportunities to add value beyond capital injection. Rather than acting solely as a financier, IGPI seeks opportunities where its involvement can influence strategy, strengthen implementation, and improve the overall viability of the project.
Equally important, IGPI looks for opportunities to bring in Japanese strengths—such as advanced technologies, operational expertise, and private-sector partners—to support delivery and long-term sustainability. The focus is on contributing capabilities, know-how, and networks that elevate both the quality and bankability of a smart city initiative.
To attract investment—particularly from Japanese investors—cities must rethink how they design, frame, and communicate their smart city initiatives.
This begins with a clear vision and a clearly defined problem to solve.
A city’s vision must be more than aspirational language. It should align with social, economic, and environmental priorities while also reflecting investor expectations. The vision needs to articulate tangible benefits for both citizens and businesses, rather than presenting broad or abstract ambitions that are difficult to operationalize or measure.
In addition, smart city projects gain traction when they address specific, well-scoped challenges—such as mobility, waste management, energy efficiency, or public service delivery. A targeted problem makes it easier to quantify outcomes, assess impact, and present a credible investment case. Investors are more confident when they can clearly evaluate expected returns, risks, and measurable benefits.
In short, ASEAN cities that link vision with evidence-backed execution can unlock Japanese investment and accelerate their path toward sustainable, smart urban transformation.
To find out more about how IGPI Group can provide support for businesses, browse through our insight articles or get in contact with us.
Febrizal, Associate of IGPI Singapore
Prior to joining IGPI, Febrizal worked at YCP Solidiance and PwC Indonesia, where he successfully completed a range of consulting projects, including market entry strategy, growth strategy, and business model identification, across diverse industries such as Agriculture, Automotive, and Industrial. He has extensive experience in M&A activities, including conducting commercial due diligence, valuations, and providing deal advisory services (connecting buy-side and sell-side). Febrizal holds a degree in Economics from Binus University.
IGPI Group is a Japan rooted premium management consulting & Investment Group headquartered in Tokyo with a footprint in Osaka, Singapore, Hanoi, Shanghai & Melbourne, as well as parts of Europe and India. The organization was established in 2007 by former members of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan (IRCJ), a USD 100 billion sovereign wealth fund focusing on turn-around projects in Japan. IGPI Group has 13 institutional investors, including Nomura Holdings, SMBC, KDDI, Recruit and Sumitomo Corporation to name a few. IGPI Group has vast experience in supporting Fortune 500s, Govt. agencies, Universities, SMEs and funded startups across Asia and beyond for their strategic business needs and hands-on support across a wide variety of industries. IGPI group has approximately 8,500 employees on a consolidated basis.
* This material is intended merely for reference purposes based on our experience and is not intended to be comprehensive and does not constitute as advice. Information contained in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but IGPI does not represent or warrant the quality, completeness, and accuracy of such information. All rights reserved by IGPI.
Three main drivers underpin this new wave of cross border investment.
First, technological catch up. Southeast Asian firms often face fierce domestic competition and often look to Japanese companies for innovations that can set their products and services apart. In fields such as manufacturing processes, advanced components and specialized services, Japan continues to offer capabilities that ASEAN firms struggle to replicate.
Second, sector specific opportunities. Industries like financial services, data centers and tourism related real estate are proving particularly attractive. For example, Singaporean property and REIT players are increasingly turning to Japan, drawn by stable demand and relatively favorable asset valuations.
Third, gateway effect. Japanese companies maintain well-established networks in the United States and Europe. For ASEAN buyers, these connections offer valuable entry points into global markets.
The appeal of Japanese assets comes with complications. Corporate cultures differ sharply. ASEAN buyers often prefer carving out specific business units from larger Japanese groups, yet such carve outs can be structurally complex. Decision making processes also diverge. Japanese firms emphasize bottom-up consensus, while ASEAN companies blend top-down strategy with centralized control. The misalignment can slow integration and frustrate both sides.
Employee welfare presents another sensitive point. Japanese management traditionally prioritizes long-term workforce security, whereas acquirers may take a more aggressive approach to rationalization. Seasoned Western acquirers have built playbooks for managing such frictions, but ASEAN firms are still in the early stages of adapting.
Japan’s regulatory system is transparent and well developed, but foreign buyers should not assume that legal compliance is the only hurdle. Informal yet influential stakeholders such as municipal governments, local associations and citizen groups can shape the perception and acceptance of an acquisition. Demonstrating long-term commitment to local communities, suppliers and customers often proves just as important as meeting regulatory requirements.
Valuations of Japanese targets tend to be higher than what ASEAN firms are accustomed to in their home markets. Yet currency movements and low-cost Japanese financing have made deals more palatable. The weak yen has provided a tailwind, while local borrowing costs remain well below ASEAN norms. This combination has encouraged buyers to look beyond headline multiples and pursue Japan as a long-term strategic destination.
Post-merger integration in Japan depends less on speed and more on patience. Japanese firms tend to move cautiously in transactions and expect acquirers to respect the pace of local decision making. Forcing an accelerated ASEAN-style timeline often backfires. Instead, success lies in empowering local management, engaging trusted intermediaries, and embedding respect for Japanese organizational norms. Done right, such acquisitions can deliver both technological uplift for ASEAN companies and new growth opportunities for Japanese targets seeking global reach.
The flow of capital from Southeast Asia into Japan remains small compared to Japan’s historic investments across ASEAN. Yet the momentum is unmistakable. Growing confidence among ASEAN corporates, coupled with Japan’s ongoing search for fresh growth drivers, is producing a more balanced two-way relationship. If the early lessons in integration are applied, this trend could usher in a new era of regional corporate cooperation, one that is less about Japan exporting its capital and more about ASEAN firms bringing their ambitions northward.
To find out more about how IGPI Group can provide support for businesses, browse through our insight articles or get in contact with us.
Kohki Sakata, Partner of IGPI Group & CEO of IGPI Singapore
After joining Cap Gemini and Coca Cola, Kohki joined Revamp Corporation where he managed projects on global expansion and turnaround in various sectors including F&B, healthcare, retail, IT, etc. After joining IGPI, he has managed projects mainly on global expansion and cross border M&A in various sectors such as logistics, IT, telecom, retail, etc. In addition to his broad experience in implementing solutions that has been developed in Western countries, he has developed multiple methods to turnaround Asian companies with focus on setting clear vision and employee empowerment. Kohki has proven the practicality of these methods by turning around Asian companies not only as an advisor but also as senior management.
He graduated from Waseda University Department of Political Science and Economics and IE Business School.
Shivaji Das, Managing Director of IGPI Singapore
Shivaji has over 20 years of strategy consulting experience, specializing in New Business Models, Innovation Roadmaps, and Sustainability Journeys. He has worked with private and public sector clients across 25 countries in sectors like Technology, Semiconductors, Chemicals, Healthcare, Renewable Energy, and Construction. Previously, Shivaji was a Partner and Managing Director-APAC at Frost & Sullivan. His paper on Artificial Intelligence was presented at CAINE-2000 in Hawaii, USA. He is the author of seven acclaimed travel, art and business books including The Visible Invisibles and Rebels, Traitors, Peacemakers (both Penguin Random House), as well as The Great Lockdown: lessons learned during the pandemic from organizations around the world (Wiley, USA).
He is an alumnus of IIT Delhi and IIM Calcutta.
IGPI Group is a Japan rooted premium management consulting & Investment Group headquartered in Tokyo with a footprint in Osaka, Singapore, Hanoi, Shanghai & Melbourne, as well as parts of Europe and India. The organization was established in 2007 by former members of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan (IRCJ), a USD 100 billion sovereign wealth fund focusing on turn-around projects in Japan. IGPI Group has 13 institutional investors, including Nomura Holdings, SMBC, KDDI, Recruit & Sumitomo Corporation to name a few. IGPI Group has vast experience in supporting Fortune 500s, Govt. agencies, Universities, SMEs and funded startups across Asia and beyond for their strategic business needs and hands-on support across a wide variety of industries. IGPI group has ~8,500 employees on a consolidated basis.
* This material is intended merely for reference purposes based on our experience and is not intended to be comprehensive and does not constitute as advice. Information contained in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but IGPI does not represent or warrant the quality, completeness, and accuracy of such information. All rights reserved by IGPI.
At the heart of Japanese interest is growth. With domestic demand constrained by demographics, ASEAN offers rising middle classes, fast digitization and youthful populations. For many Japanese firms, the region provides not only scale but also dynamism.
Key sectors include retail and e-commerce, financial technology and renewable energy, where Japanese firms see opportunities to combine their technological expertise with ASEAN’s market potential. Carbon neutrality initiatives make renewable energy particularly attractive, while digital platforms and consumer services are natural fits for Japanese companies seeking relevance in the 21st century.
Geopolitical shifts add to the attraction. As tensions complicate supply chains in other regions, ASEAN stands out as a resilient alternative and a springboard to global markets. Japanese companies increasingly view ASEAN not only as a source of local demand but also as a strategic hedge to sustain their international presence.
The opportunities, however, come with obstacles. ASEAN is not a single market but a collection of ten countries with varying governance standards. Singapore offers world-class transparency, while emerging economies may present opaque ownership structures or incomplete financial reporting. Japanese investors, accustomed to rigorous due diligence, often find themselves facing incomplete accounts, uncertain ownership records or multiple versions of financial statements. This slows transactions and heightens reliance on local advisors. Successful acquirers typically start small, building familiarity with regional practices before scaling. Flexibility in risk frameworks and an appreciation for the uneven pace of regulatory development are essential.
Sustained Japanese interest is visible across several industries. Consumer goods and retail, financial technology and services, logistics, healthcare and renewable energy stand out. Logistics and e-commerce infrastructure are booming across the region, where Japanese operational expertise can be leveraged. Healthcare and aged care are also fast-growing opportunities.
What began with Japanese trading houses is now expanding to a broader set of players eager to export medical technology and care models. Renewable energy projects, closely aligned with Japan’s sustainability goals, are another frontier.
Despite the appeal, Japanese investors often underestimate the complexity of local networks. Beyond regulatory unpredictability and data reliability, informal relationships and founder dynamics can strongly influence outcomes. Political risks further complicate investments, as sudden policy changes may disrupt imports, manufacturing, or distribution. Without strong and trusted local partnerships, even promising ventures can falter.
The most effective integration models are based on partnership rather than control. Japanese acquirers who impose rigid governance frameworks often encounter resistance. By contrast, those who provide strategic guidance and resources while allowing local managers autonomy tend to succeed. Joint leadership teams, cross cultural training and shared performance goals help maintain entrepreneurial agility while strengthening corporate processes.
The timing of this interest is not accidental. The volume of outbound M&A from Japan in 2025 has already reached nearly three times the level of 2024. ASEAN, given its demographics, openness to investment and alignment with Japanese strategic needs, is likely to remain a prime destination for Japanese corporates.
Japan’s corporate expansion into ASEAN reflects more than a search for growth. It is a recognition that the region’s dynamism can complement Japan’s technological strengths and management expertise. If Japanese firms can adapt to local conditions with patience and partnership, their acquisitions can not only revive their own growth prospects but also accelerate ASEAN’s integration into global value chains.
To find out more about how IGPI Group can provide support for businesses, browse through our insight articles or get in contact with us.
Kohki Sakata, Partner of IGPI Group & CEO of IGPI Singapore
After joining Cap Gemini and Coca Cola, Kohki joined Revamp Corporation where he managed projects on global expansion and turnaround in various sectors including F&B, healthcare, retail, IT, etc. After joining IGPI, he has managed projects mainly on global expansion and cross border M&A in various sectors such as logistics, IT, telecom, retail, etc. In addition to his broad experience in implementing solutions that has been developed in Western countries, he has developed multiple methods to turnaround Asian companies with focus on setting clear vision and employee empowerment. Kohki has proven the practicality of these methods by turning around Asian companies not only as an advisor but also as senior management.
He graduated from Waseda University Department of Political Science and Economics and IE Business School.
Shivaji Das, Managing Director of IGPI Singapore
Shivaji has over 20 years of strategy consulting experience, specializing in New Business Models, Innovation Roadmaps, and Sustainability Journeys. He has worked with private and public sector clients across 25 countries in sectors like Technology, Semiconductors, Chemicals, Healthcare, Renewable Energy, and Construction. Previously, Shivaji was a Partner and Managing Director-APAC at Frost & Sullivan. His paper on Artificial Intelligence was presented at CAINE-2000 in Hawaii, USA. He is the author of seven acclaimed travel, art and business books including The Visible Invisibles and Rebels, Traitors, Peacemakers (both Penguin Random House), as well as The Great Lockdown: lessons learned during the pandemic from organizations around the world (Wiley, USA).
He is an alumnus of IIT Delhi and IIM Calcutta.
IGPI Group is a Japan rooted premium management consulting & Investment Group headquartered in Tokyo with a footprint in Osaka, Singapore, Hanoi, Shanghai & Melbourne, as well as parts of Europe and India. The organization was established in 2007 by former members of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan (IRCJ), a USD 100 billion sovereign wealth fund focusing on turn-around projects in Japan. IGPI Group has 13 institutional investors, including Nomura Holdings, SMBC, KDDI, Recruit & Sumitomo Corporation to name a few. IGPI Group has vast experience in supporting Fortune 500s, Govt. agencies, Universities, SMEs and funded startups across Asia and beyond for their strategic business needs and hands-on support across a wide variety of industries. IGPI group has ~8,500 employees on a consolidated basis.
* This material is intended merely for reference purposes based on our experience and is not intended to be comprehensive and does not constitute as advice. Information contained in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but IGPI does not represent or warrant the quality, completeness, and accuracy of such information. All rights reserved by IGPI.
Today, drones in ASEAN have moved beyond experimentation to become key enablers of industrial transformation and an integrated component of smart city development. Their applications go far beyond supporting construction and infrastructure projects—they also contribute directly to enhancing urban livability and resilience. From traffic monitoring and medical deliveries to environmental management and public safety, drones are shaping the essential features of future smart cities across the region.
This article explores the ASEAN’s drone market landscape, highlighting current trends, industry opportunities, and the challenges that must be addressed for to unlock future opportunities.
The drone industry in ASEAN is experiencing strong growth. According to Statista, market revenue was valued at around USD 43 million in 2025, reflecting a 15% CAGR between 2020 and 2025. Looking ahead, market revenue is projected to reach USD 59 million by 2030, supported by rising adoption across industries.
At present, drone applications in ASEAN are concentrated in 6 major sectors:
| – | Agriculture: | precision farming, crop monitoring, and yield management |
| – | Construction & Infrastructure: | site mapping, monitoring, and project management |
| – | Mining: | exploration, mapping, and operational monitoring |
| – | Defense & Security: | surveillance, reconnaissance, target acquisition, crowd monitoring, and search operations |
| – | Energy: | asset inspection, maintenance, and grid monitoring |
| – | Oil & Gas: | surveying, exploration mapping, and pipeline inspection |
Beyond these industries, drones are also emerging as a transformative force in smart city development. Their applications extend from the construction phase, such as urban planning and infrastructure monitoring, to operational services that directly improve quality of life. This includes road traffic monitoring and control, environmental surveillance, disaster management, medical transportation, and even logistics and delivery services with multiple pilot programs are already underway across ASEAN.
A GUTMA study on Unmanned Traffic Management (UTM) maturity shows ASEAN’s varying readiness for scalable drone operations:
| – | Singapore: | Tier 2 (Advanced) |
| – | Malaysia: | Tier 3 (Developed) |
| – | Indonesia & Thailand: | Tier 4 (Emerging) |
| – | Philippines & Vietnam: | Tier 5 (Nascent) |
The report identifies limited progress in Technology and Business & Market aspects, which could constrain the feasibility and attractiveness of the ASEAN drone market.
On the technology side, most ASEAN countries lack systems for dynamic airspace management and secure data exchange. Only Singapore and Malaysia have foundational UTM capabilities. Singapore operates a Centralized Flight Management System (CFMS) integrated with eSOMS and the “FlySafe” app, while Malaysia provides basic UTM services through the LOOKA Platform. Both countries are developing more advanced UTM systems to further enhance drone registration, monitoring, and airspace integration.
On the business side, market awareness remains low. Most ASEAN countries have limited understanding of the economic potential of drone services, lacking insights on market sizing, value chain mapping, and business models. Currently, only Malaysia has conducted a market size analysis, including an assessment of drone services’ contribution to national GDP and the job market by 2030.
The drone industry in ASEAN is evolving within a uniquely complex landscape shaped by fragmented regulations and diverse national priorities for adoption.
While most ASEAN-6 countries have already established general regulatory frameworks for drone operations, significant differences remain in how these rules are applied—creating barriers for seamless regional growth.
For example, Singapore requires drones weighing more than 250 grams to be registered, compared to 20 kilograms in Malaysia and 2 kilograms in Thailand. These variations in permit processes, licensing, import restrictions, and safety requirements reflect the broader regulatory fragmentation that complicates cross-border operations and market entry for drone businesses.
At the same time, ASEAN countries also pursue different application priorities. Agricultural economies such as Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines have focused on drones for farming and forestry, while Singapore has applied them mainly to infrastructure monitoring and urban management. More recently, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand have expanded beyond agriculture into security-related uses, including counter-insurgency and border surveillance, reflecting rising domestic and regional security concerns.
The ASEAN low-altitude economy, particularly the drone sector, has strong growth potential. However, penetrating this market requires industry players to effectively manage both legal and commercial risks in order to capture the opportunities.
Given ASEAN’s smart city ambitions, localization strategies will be critical. Each country has unique urban challenges, and solutions must address specific needs of each city, whether related to infrastructure, mobility, disaster management, or public safety, companies need to provide tangible value which accelerate smart city progress.
Achieving this requires deep understanding of local markets and a physical presence to navigate diverse regulatory and commercial landscapes. One effective strategy is to leverage government initiatives. For example, Malaysia has introduced a regulatory sandbox that enables companies to test and refine drone solutions in real-world conditions, ensuring they meet both regulatory requirements and actual market needs. Equally important is building strong partnerships with local stakeholders—from government agencies to industry players. Such collaborations not only help in navigating regulatory hurdles but also provide critical insights into local practices, enabling companies to deliver solutions that are both compliant and relevant.
To unlock full potential, companies must take a structured approach, mapping the market landscape across regulatory, technological, and commercial dimensions, while also fostering regional collaboration that will be integral for long-term growth.
To find out more about how IGPI Group can provide support for businesses, browse through our insight articles or get in contact with us.
Febrizal, Associate of IGPI Singapore
Prior to joining IGPI, Febrizal worked at YCP Solidiance and PwC Indonesia, where he successfully completed a range of consulting projects, including market entry strategy, growth strategy, and business model identification, across diverse industries such as Agriculture, Automotive, and Industrial. He has extensive experience in M&A activities, including conducting commercial due diligence, valuations, and providing deal advisory services (connecting buy-side and sell-side). Febrizal holds a degree in Economics from Binus University.
IGPI Group is a Japan rooted premium management consulting & Investment Group headquartered in Tokyo with a footprint in Osaka, Singapore, Hanoi, Shanghai & Melbourne, as well as parts of Europe and India. The organization was established in 2007 by former members of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan (IRCJ), a USD 100 billion sovereign wealth fund focusing on turn-around projects in Japan. IGPI Group has 13 institutional investors, including Nomura Holdings, SMBC, KDDI, Recruit and Sumitomo Corporation to name a few. IGPI Group has vast experience in supporting Fortune 500s, Govt. agencies, Universities, SMEs and funded startups across Asia and beyond for their strategic business needs and hands-on support across a wide variety of industries. IGPI group has approximately 8,500 employees on a consolidated basis.
* This material is intended merely for reference purposes based on our experience and is not intended to be comprehensive and does not constitute as advice. Information contained in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but IGPI does not represent or warrant the quality, completeness, and accuracy of such information. All rights reserved by IGPI.
Few countries possess the depth of experience that Japan has in areas now central to Singapore’s construction agenda. Off-site modular construction, robotics for site automation, seismic-resilient structures, and next-generation building materials are all domains where Japanese firms excel. These capabilities are highly relevant as Singapore pushes for higher productivity, faster project timelines, and more greener outcomes.
Opportunities are also emerging in zero-energy buildings, water-sensitive urban design, and smart infrastructure systems. Japan’s experience with integrated urban planning and clean, efficient design positions its firms to deliver solutions that go beyond compliance, offering strategic ESG value to both government and private sector clients.
The shift toward sustainable and ESG-oriented construction in Singapore creates an additional pathway. Japanese companies that offer integrated consulting services which combines engineering expertise with green building solutions are well placed to capture demand in design, operations, and lifecycle management.
Beyond the familiar sectors, there are niches where Japanese capabilities offer unique value. Construction waste management is gaining urgency in Singapore, where buildings are often demolished and rebuilt on rapid cycles. Japan’s leadership in waste reduction, recycling, and process discipline offers a roadmap for more circular practices.
Likewise, Japan’s unparalleled expertise in disaster detection and early warning systems can support Singapore’s climate adaptation agenda. Technologies developed for earthquake-prone rail systems, such as Japan’s high-speed sensor networks, could be adapted to coastal protection or critical infrastructure management in the region.
These are not just technical exports. They are operational philosophies rooted in a culture of foresight, systems thinking, and preparedness, which are qualities increasingly essential in a world of cascading risks.
Singapore remains highly receptive to foreign construction solutions, especially when they serve national imperatives in safety, sustainability, and efficiency. However, openness does not guarantee success. Japanese firms must localise their offerings technically, operationally, and commercially.
Solutions must adapt to tropical climates, local building codes, and highly competitive pricing environments. Japanese companies, often optimised for high-spec domestic delivery, must re-engineer their models for cost-conscious, value-driven markets.
Equally important is the ability to engage early with regulators, developers, and project owners. Many Singaporean agencies now manage project planning in-house. Success requires presence from the concept and ideation stage, not only at the tender phase.
Japanese companies enjoy strong reputations in Singapore for reliability, precision, and technical integrity. These qualities resonate with both public and private stakeholders. Yet reputation alone does not secure contracts.
Speed, transparency, and cultural flexibility are increasingly essential. This includes responsiveness to project timelines, openness in partnerships, and the ability to tailor offerings to specific market needs.
Demonstration matters. Firms that have established innovation labs, run pilot projects, or co-developed solutions with local stakeholders have seen greater success. Market visibility builds credibility especially in a market where decision-making is fast-paced and data-driven.
The most effective market strategies involve collaboration. Joint ventures, strategic alliances, and public-private consortiums remain the preferred entry routes. Acquisitions of local players or strategic partnerships with engineering consultancies can offer immediate access to networks and pipelines.
But structure alone is not sufficient. Companies must show commitment through localisation, capability transfer, and long-term engagement. Those who do will find Singapore not just a market, but a regional platform for Southeast Asia’s construction sector.
Singapore’s influence extends well beyond its borders. It is a reference city for infrastructure development across Southeast Asia, and increasingly, a global showcase for smart, sustainable urbanism. To succeed here is to demonstrate global leadership.
The moment is opportune. Singapore is positioning itself as a next-generation construction hub in Asia. Its openness to innovation, pro-business policies, and scale of ambition make it a rare environment for experimentation and growth.
Japanese firms with their unmatched technical DNA are uniquely placed to shape this future. But doing so requires more than exporting excellence. It will require embedding themselves in the ecosystem, adapting to its pace, and building trust at every level.
Singapore does not need more suppliers. It needs co-creators in construction and urban innovation. The Japanese companies that recognise this and act boldly will not only thrive in Singapore. They will help define what the global construction sector looks like in the decades to come.
To find out more about how IGPI Group can provide support for businesses, browse through our insight articles or get in contact with us.
Kohki Sakata, Partner of IGPI Group & CEO of IGPI Singapore
After joining Cap Gemini and Coca Cola, Kohki joined Revamp Corporation where he managed projects on global expansion and turnaround in various sectors including F&B, healthcare, retail, IT, etc. After joining IGPI, he has managed projects mainly on global expansion and cross border M&A in various sectors such as logistics, IT, telecom, retail, etc. In addition to his broad experience in implementing solutions that has been developed in Western countries, he has developed multiple methods to turnaround Asian companies with focus on setting clear vision and employee empowerment. Kohki has proven the practicality of these methods by turning around Asian companies not only as an advisor but also as senior management.
He graduated from Waseda University Department of Political Science and Economics and IE Business School.
Shivaji Das, Managing Director of IGPI Singapore
Shivaji has over 20 years of strategy consulting experience, specializing in New Business Models, Innovation Roadmaps, and Sustainability Journeys. He has worked with private and public sector clients across 25 countries in sectors like Technology, Semiconductors, Chemicals, Healthcare, Renewable Energy, and Construction. Previously, Shivaji was a Partner and Managing Director-APAC at Frost & Sullivan. His paper on Artificial Intelligence was presented at CAINE-2000 in Hawaii, USA. He is the author of seven acclaimed travel, art and business books including The Visible Invisibles and Rebels, Traitors, Peacemakers (both Penguin Random House), as well as The Great Lockdown: lessons learned during the pandemic from organizations around the world (Wiley, USA).
He is an alumnus of IIT Delhi and IIM Calcutta.
IGPI Group is a Japan rooted premium management consulting & Investment Group headquartered in Tokyo with a footprint in Osaka, Singapore, Hanoi, Shanghai & Melbourne, as well as parts of Europe and India. The organization was established in 2007 by former members of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan (IRCJ), a USD 100 billion sovereign wealth fund focusing on turn-around projects in Japan. IGPI Group has 13 institutional investors, including Nomura Holdings, SMBC, KDDI, Recruit & Sumitomo Corporation to name a few. IGPI Group has vast experience in supporting Fortune 500s, Govt. agencies, Universities, SMEs and funded startups across Asia and beyond for their strategic business needs and hands-on support across a wide variety of industries. IGPI group has ~8,500 employees on a consolidated basis.
* This material is intended merely for reference purposes based on our experience and is not intended to be comprehensive and does not constitute as advice. Information contained in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but IGPI does not represent or warrant the quality, completeness, and accuracy of such information. All rights reserved by IGPI.
Over the past decade, Singapore’s construction sector has evolved from capacity expansion to strategic nation-building. Mega-projects such as the Changi Airport Terminal 5, the expansion of MRT lines, large-scale public housing upgrades, and creation of new integrated healthcare hubs reflects more than engineering ambition but signals a deliberate national pivot.
These projects, projected to generate SGD 40 to 50 billion annually in construction output over the next 6 to 8 years, anchor domestic economic stability in an era of global trade volatility and geopolitical friction.
However, despite its strategic importance, the sector remains heavily reliant on manual labor and foreign manpower. Singapore continues to depend on workers from countries such as Bangladesh, India and China to fill vital construction roles. This model, while functional, is increasingly unsustainable in a context of rising labor costs, tighter immigration rules, and geopolitical uncertainty.
Like many other markets, the Singapore construction ecosystem is structurally fragmented. Thousands of small contractors and subcontractors operate in silos, making widespread innovation adoption difficult.
Digital systems such as Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) can only deliver their full potential when they are adopted across the entire ecosystem. In fragmented markets, investments in such technologies often fail to scale.
To address this, the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) is championing ecosystem-wide digital standards, public-private partnerships, and offering targeted incentives to encourage digital transformation. Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA), robotics-driven site automation, and drone-based inspections are gaining traction. These are no longer peripheral experiments; they are becoming foundational to productivity, quality control and risk reduction.
For Singapore, sustainability is not optional, it is existential. As a low-lying tropical island with net-zero ambitions by 2050, Singapore must engineer its built environment to withstand rising sea levels, extreme rainfall and intensifying heat. Green certification systems such as Green Mark and LEED have become industry standard. Yet, deeper structural change is required.
A major issue lies in Singapore’s short building life cycle. Compared to Japan or Europe, Singapore’s buildings are torn down and rebuilt more frequently, generating high volumes of construction waste. The future lies in better lifecycle planning, material reuse, and technologies such as carbon passports that track environmental impact from cradle to grave.
At the same time, new materials are gaining prominence. From engineered wood to fly ash composites and low-emission steel, the industry is exploring environmentally responsible alternatives. Prefabricated components and modular construction are also gaining momentum, offering reductions in waste and improvements in build-time precision.
Adaptation strategies are equally vital. From heat-reflective building materials and shaded walkways to underground infrastructure and coastal barriers, Singapore’s construction sector is at the forefront of climate-resilient urban design. At the same time, worker safety, especially amid rising temperatures, will require greater night-shift operations and enhanced workplace protections.
A distinctive feature of the sector is the dominance of foreign contractors, particularly from China, Korea and Japan. While technically capable, their global business priorities do not always align with Singapore’s national goals, particularly in sustainability and innovation.
In contrast, Singapore’s local champions have emerged as global thought leaders in design and planning. Firms such as Surbana Jurong, RSP and DP Architects now influence projects far beyond the island’s borders. These consultancies, shaped by Singapore’s success in urban planning and public housing, represent the intellectual capital of the sector.
To bridge this asymmetry, regulators are stepping in to align procurement policies and sustainability benchmarks with national objectives. Increasingly, public contracts mandate digital adoption and green certification, nudging the sector toward a balanced equilibrium between foreign execution capacity and local strategic vision.
The next wave of construction transformation may come from unexpected regions, especially Central and Eastern Europe, where dual-use and defense-adjacent startups are developing modular construction, robotics, and advanced building materials in resource-constrained settings.
Through collaboration with venture investment platforms such as FF Red and White, Singapore can explore how to integrate these frontier technologies into its own ecosystem. The goal is not only to import innovation but to co-create solutions that can define the next phase of global construction standards.
The Singapore construction industry is no longer about simply pouring concrete or laying steel. It is a platform for strategic investment, digital transformation and climate resilience. The city-state is turning its construction sector into a model of how governments, industry players and innovators can collaborate to meet the challenges of the 21st century.
As global markets seek certainty and cities search for models of sustainable development, Singapore’s evolving construction ecosystem offers a powerful case study. It is not only building for today, but engineering a resilience, sustainable foundation for tomorrow.
To find out more about how IGPI Group can provide support for businesses, browse through our insight articles or get in contact with us.
Kohki Sakata, Partner of IGPI Group & CEO of IGPI Singapore
After joining Cap Gemini and Coca Cola, Kohki joined Revamp Corporation where he managed projects on global expansion and turnaround in various sectors including F&B, healthcare, retail, IT, etc. After joining IGPI, he has managed projects mainly on global expansion and cross border M&A in various sectors such as logistics, IT, telecom, retail, etc. In addition to his broad experience in implementing solutions that has been developed in Western countries, he has developed multiple methods to turnaround Asian companies with focus on setting clear vision and employee empowerment. Kohki has proven the practicality of these methods by turning around Asian companies not only as an advisor but also as senior management.
He graduated from Waseda University Department of Political Science and Economics and IE Business School.
Shivaji Das, Managing Director of IGPI Singapore
Shivaji has over 20 years of strategy consulting experience, specializing in New Business Models, Innovation Roadmaps, and Sustainability Journeys. He has worked with private and public sector clients across 25 countries in sectors like Technology, Semiconductors, Chemicals, Healthcare, Renewable Energy, and Construction. Previously, Shivaji was a Partner and Managing Director-APAC at Frost & Sullivan. His paper on Artificial Intelligence was presented at CAINE-2000 in Hawaii, USA. He is the author of seven acclaimed travel, art and business books including The Visible Invisibles and Rebels, Traitors, Peacemakers (both Penguin Random House), as well as The Great Lockdown: lessons learned during the pandemic from organizations around the world (Wiley, USA).
He is an alumnus of IIT Delhi and IIM Calcutta.
IGPI Group is a Japan rooted premium management consulting & Investment Group headquartered in Tokyo with a footprint in Osaka, Singapore, Hanoi, Shanghai & Melbourne, as well as parts of Europe and India. The organization was established in 2007 by former members of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan (IRCJ), a USD 100 billion sovereign wealth fund focusing on turn-around projects in Japan. IGPI Group has 13 institutional investors, including Nomura Holdings, SMBC, KDDI, Recruit & Sumitomo Corporation to name a few. IGPI Group has vast experience in supporting Fortune 500s, Govt. agencies, Universities, SMEs and funded startups across Asia and beyond for their strategic business needs and hands-on support across a wide variety of industries. IGPI group has ~8,500 employees on a consolidated basis.
* This material is intended merely for reference purposes based on our experience and is not intended to be comprehensive and does not constitute as advice. Information contained in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but IGPI does not represent or warrant the quality, completeness, and accuracy of such information. All rights reserved by IGPI.
The newly envisioned Johor–Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ) offers a real-world laboratory for addressing these gaps. But for this model to become a prototype for broader integration, foreign investors must recalibrate expectations, and policymakers must confront structural bottlenecks head-on.
ASEAN’s charm lies in its diversity—but so do its challenges. While the bloc has made commendable strides in reducing tariffs and building cross-border manufacturing networks, it remains far from a unified economic system. Labor mobility is limited. Regulatory frameworks vary significantly. Legal interpretations shift not only by country but also by jurisdiction within countries.
The comparison with the European Union is instructive. EU economies may differ in size and character, but their integration is underpinned by harmonized legal structures, mutual recognition of standards, and enforceable treaties. ASEAN, by contrast, functions more like a patchwork of bilateral understandings, informal cooperation, and inconsistent rulebooks.
For companies hoping to plug into regional supply chains or scale seamlessly across borders, this means facing an operational maze, from incompatible logistics regulations to shipping restrictions and bureaucratic red tape.
Perhaps the most insidious challenge is one of legal unpredictability. In many ASEAN jurisdictions, the rule of law exists—but the ability to predict how it will be interpreted or enforced often does not. This uncertainty, while manageable for domestic entrepreneurs used to navigating grey zones, becomes a deal-breaker for boards in Tokyo, Frankfurt, or New York.
When corporate investment decisions hinge on long-term capital deployment and regulatory stability, ambiguity is expensive. For new economic zones such as JS-SEZ to attract serious foreign capital, they must offer more than incentives—they must deliver regulatory clarity and enforcement consistency.
Even partial legal insulation within designated industrial corridors or digital zones, could significantly enhance investor confidence.
Japan’s development model offers lessons for ASEAN. Postwar industrialization in Japan did not concentrate solely in Tokyo or Osaka. Through deliberate policy—led by agencies like METI—Japan nurtured industrial clusters nationwide, ensuring inclusive, regionally balanced growth.
Japanese companies, many of which were born from this distributed ecosystem, are uniquely suited to help ASEAN avoid the pitfalls of uneven development. They bring not only technological capability but also the operational discipline to build sustainable, long-term infrastructure in second-tier cities and overlooked geographies.
Moreover, Japan’s increasingly robust ESG posture makes its companies natural partners in addressing ASEAN’s social and environmental gaps—from labor protections to climate resilience. In this regard, Japan’s “soft power” of ethical business may prove more enduring than capital alone.
Amid escalating geopolitical rivalries, ASEAN offers something rare: neutrality. As global powers decouple and reconfigure trade alliances, Southeast Asia has emerged as a bridge—not a battleground. Its member states have deftly navigated competing pressures, signing trade pacts with the US while maintaining economic ties with China.
For Japanese firms, this geopolitical balance is not just a buffer—it’s a strategic asset. The JS-SEZ and similar corridors provide a platform to localize manufacturing, diversify suppliers, and serve regional markets—without choosing sides in great power competition. In an era of tariff shocks and regulatory unpredictability, this agility is worth its weight in gold.
To succeed in ASEAN, Japanese firms may need to rethink their own playbook. Rigid three-year business plans, while effective in stable environments, can become straitjackets in fluid, fast-evolving markets. Agility—both strategic and operational—must become core capabilities.
Rather than waiting for ideal conditions or attempting to deliver full-suite solutions from the outset, firms should lead with problem-solving. Enter with focused offerings that solve specific, localized pain points. Build trust. Prove value. Scale later.
This shift requires not just different tactics but a different mindset: from control to co-creation, from certainty to exploration. Regular on-the-ground research, agile partnerships, and culturally fluent teams will be essential in identifying the right entry windows and expansion triggers.
ASEAN’s integration journey will not mirror Europe’s—but that does not mean it is doomed to remain fragmented. With visionary public-private collaboration and sustained institutional reform, corridors like the Johor–Singapore SEZ can become blueprints for the region’s next chapter.
For Japanese companies—and their global peers—the road ahead is not without risk. But those who embrace ASEAN’s realities, invest in its capabilities, and help shape its institutions will not just participate in its growth. They will help define it.
To find out more about how IGPI Group can provide support for businesses, browse through our insight articles or get in contact with us.
Kohki Sakata, Partner of IGPI Group & CEO of IGPI Singapore
After joining Cap Gemini and Coca Cola, Kohki joined Revamp Corporation where he managed projects on global expansion and turnaround in various sectors including F&B, healthcare, retail, IT, etc. After joining IGPI, he has managed projects mainly on global expansion and cross border M&A in various sectors such as logistics, IT, telecom, retail, etc. In addition to his broad experience in implementing solutions that has been developed in Western countries, he has developed multiple methods to turnaround Asian companies with focus on setting clear vision and employee empowerment. Kohki has proven the practicality of these methods by turning around Asian companies not only as an advisor but also as senior management.
He graduated from Waseda University Department of Political Science and Economics and IE Business School.
Shivaji Das, Managing Director of IGPI Singapore
Shivaji has over 20 years of strategy consulting experience, specializing in New Business Models, Innovation Roadmaps, and Sustainability Journeys. He has worked with private and public sector clients across 25 countries in sectors like Technology, Semiconductors, Chemicals, Healthcare, Renewable Energy, and Construction. Previously, Shivaji was a Partner and Managing Director-APAC at Frost & Sullivan. His paper on Artificial Intelligence was presented at CAINE-2000 in Hawaii, USA. He is the author of seven acclaimed travel, art and business books including The Visible Invisibles and Rebels, Traitors, Peacemakers (both Penguin Random House), as well as The Great Lockdown: lessons learned during the pandemic from organizations around the world (Wiley, USA).
He is an alumnus of IIT Delhi and IIM Calcutta.
IGPI Group is a Japan rooted premium management consulting & Investment Group headquartered in Tokyo with a footprint in Osaka, Singapore, Hanoi, Shanghai & Melbourne, as well as parts of Europe and India. The organization was established in 2007 by former members of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan (IRCJ), a USD 100 billion sovereign wealth fund focusing on turn-around projects in Japan. IGPI Group has 13 institutional investors, including Nomura Holdings, SMBC, KDDI, Recruit & Sumitomo Corporation to name a few. IGPI Group has vast experience in supporting Fortune 500s, Govt. agencies, Universities, SMEs and funded startups across Asia and beyond for their strategic business needs and hands-on support across a wide variety of industries. IGPI group has ~8,500 employees on a consolidated basis.
* This material is intended merely for reference purposes based on our experience and is not intended to be comprehensive and does not constitute as advice. Information contained in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but IGPI does not represent or warrant the quality, completeness, and accuracy of such information. All rights reserved by IGPI.
Copyright© 2025 Industrial Growth Platform Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. Web Excellence by Verz
